[ts-gen] create & modify orders

[Nils Gebhardt]

Paul, Bill, 

Thanks a lot for your help. 

On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 10:41 +0100, Paul C wrote:
> 
> >  Scan: 14 17 0 <LMT>
> >   2 Term: mod TmpK       (nil)
> >   3    Grammar rule: Terminal (TmpK)
> >   4    Grammar rule: Compound (mod)
> >   5    Syntax error:
> >   6    Cursor state: match; text is:
> >   7    create item 1 LMT 2 40.00 0.0;
> >   8    -----------------^------------
> >   9    Grammar rule: Compound (create)
> >  10    Syntax error:
> >  11    Cursor state: match; text is:
> >  12    create item 1 LMT 2 40.00 0.0;
> >  13    -----------------^------------
> >  14    Scan: 12 13 1 <1>
> >  15    Term: submit TmpK       (nil)
> >  16    Grammar rule: Terminal (TmpK)
> >  17    Grammar rule: Compound (submit)
> >  18    Syntax error:
> >  19    Cursor state: match; text is:
> >  20    submit item 1;
> >  21    -------------^
> >  22    Terminal tag: name:TmpK index:3
> 
> Maybe you are not using the "bind" command before the "create"?  The
> example below seems to work.  I've used strings "one" and "two", but
> they could be anything.  I think the "12" is currently a dummy
> parameter that just needs to be there.  Probably somebody will give a
> better explanation later, but hopefully this will work: 


Indeed, I missed the point with 'bind'. 
Shim errors disappeared, new tws errors occured. If I try GBL June
Contract, it says 
"Security GBL is not allowed for this account...."
This used to work in my old setup. As I understand the table Template
replaces LineItem and requires about the same input and referes to table
Position. So, in this example, I have 

+-----+------+-----+------+-----+-----+--------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+---------+
| uid | side | pid | gid  | pro | fid | pArent | gat  | gud  | size |
fad  | iid  | box  | vid  | comment |

|   8 |    1 |   6 | NULL |   2 |   2 |   NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL |
NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL    | 

with pid refering to 

|   6 | 216 | 2008-04-16 22:38:43 | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | BUND  | 

which in turn refers to 
+-----+------+-------+------+-----+
| uid | sid  | route | unit | tag |
+-----+------+-------+------+-----+
| 216 | 5498 |    13 |   45 |  30 | 
+-----+------+-------+------+-----+

in table Contract. tag 30 points to expiry 200806. 

 
Has there anything changed causing some bad specification of the
contract? 


regards

Nils